Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 M315

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 M315

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +1643%
12.99 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M315
0.745 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1635 MHz
Base Clock
-
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

101.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.760 GPixel/s
203.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.28 GTexel/s
12.99 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
745.0 GFLOPS
12.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
745.0 GFLOPS
203.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
46.56 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Meso
-
GPU Variant
Meso LE (216-0864046)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy