Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA T550 Mobile

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA T550 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM T550 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T550 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1665MHz vs 1455MHz)
Lower TDP (23W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +162%
8.94 TFLOPS
T550 Mobile
3.41 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2022
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
16
3072
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.6 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.820 TFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.410 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
106.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net