NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6500M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon RX 6500M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (2400MHz vs 1455MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+81%
8.94 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6500M
4.915 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
76.80 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
153.6 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.830 TFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.915 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
307.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XM
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
