Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1455MHz vs 1035MHz)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (394.2GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +68%
8.94 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5600M
5.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
1035 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
394.2GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
40
3072
Shading Units
2560
96
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.24 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
331.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Navi 12
-
GPU Variant
Navi 12
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy