NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon E8950
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Radeon E8950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1455MHz vs 1000MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+118%
8.94 TFLOPS
Radeon E8950
4.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Sep 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
256.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
E8950
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3
