Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5250

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2007
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
350 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
-
96
TMUs
12
48
ROPs
12
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.400 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
M66
-
GPU Variant
M66-P (216BGCKC13FG)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy