NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 83% (1455MHz vs 797MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+265%
8.94 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
2.448 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
797 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
1536
96
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.0 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.448 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
102.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
122W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-GTX-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
