NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.26GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+1193%
8.94 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
0.691 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1254 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.80 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N13P-GT-W-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
