Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 645M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +1543%
8.94 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 645M
0.544 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.672 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.69 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
544.5 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.69 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N13P-GS
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
32W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy