NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 M360
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 79% (2010MHz vs 1125MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+1329%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M360
0.864 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1100 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.000 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.00 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
864.0 GFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
864.0 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
54.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Meso
-
GPU Variant
Meso XT
(216-0864018)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
