NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro 460
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 460 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 122% (2010MHz vs 907MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 81.28GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro 460 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+564%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 460
1.858 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
81.28GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.51 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.05 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.858 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.858 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
116.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Baffin
-
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
3 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
