NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility Radeon X2300
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 64MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X2300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.272GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
M6x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.272GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
-
96
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.916 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.916 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
M64
-
GPU Variant
M64-M
(216PVAVA12FG)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
