NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3060 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 57% (2010MHz vs 1282MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 60W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+25%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Max Q
9.846 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
817 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1282 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
30
3072
Shading Units
3840
96
TMUs
120
48
ROPs
48
96
Tensor Cores
120
24
RT Cores
30
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
61.54 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
153.8 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.846 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.846 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GA106
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
12 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
