NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (2010MHz vs 1477MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+104%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
6.05 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1185 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1477 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
16
3072
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
64
24
RT Cores
32
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.26 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.53 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.10 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.050 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
189.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
