NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce MX570
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX570 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 74% (2010MHz vs 1155MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX570 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+161%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce MX570
4.731 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2022
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
832 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1155 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
16
3072
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
40
96
Tensor Cores
64
24
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.20 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.92 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.731 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.731 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GA107
-
GPU Variant
MX570
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
