NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (2010MHz vs 1594MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+908%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2020
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1531 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
3
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.26 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.13 GFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1224 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.26 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GP108
-
GPU Variant
GP108-655-A1
(N17S-G3-A1)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
