NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 71% (2010MHz vs 1176MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+720%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 960M
1.505 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1097 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1176 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
640
96
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.82 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
47.04 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.505 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-GX-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
