NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 615
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 615 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 615 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+9624%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce 615
0.127 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600A
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
1
3072
Shading Units
48
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.320 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.280 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
126.7 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
10.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
49W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GF108
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
