NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 800W)
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (2520MHz vs 2130MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
15616 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
TITAN Ada
+674%
92.9 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
2235 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1.15TB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
144
2816
Shading Units
18432
88
TMUs
576
48
ROPs
192
88
Tensor Cores
576
22
RT Cores
144
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
800W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
