NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon X1600 XT Dual
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 XT Dual to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 22.08GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
690 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.08GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
-
88
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.360 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.360 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x Molex
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
RV530
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
