Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (70W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +109%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2
5.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2014
Quadro Ada
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
44
2816
Shading Units
2816
88
TMUs
176
48
ROPs
64
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Vesuvius
-
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy