Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (2130MHz vs 1855MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +129%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5500
5.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Feb 2020
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
1744 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1855 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
22
2816
Shading Units
1408
88
TMUs
88
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.36 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.2 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.45 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.224 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
326.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy