NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA P104 101
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM P104 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (2130MHz vs 1683MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 125W)
NVIDIA P104 101 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.3GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+39%
12 TFLOPS
P104 101
8.617 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2018
Quadro Ada
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
20
2816
Shading Units
2560
88
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
64
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
107.7 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
269.3 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
134.6 GFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.617 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
269.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
GP104-101-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
16 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
