Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S50

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM MTT S50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 85W)
Moore Threads MTT S50 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +144%
12 TFLOPS
MTT S50
4.915 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Oct 2023
Quadro Ada
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
22
SM Count
2816
Shading Units
2048
88
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
128
88
Tensor Cores
22
RT Cores
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
153.6 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
153.6 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.830 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.915 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
85W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
-
GPU Variant
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net