NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA H200 NVL
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 141GB VRAM H200 NVL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (2130MHz vs 1785MHz)
Lower TDP (70W vs 600W)
NVIDIA H200 NVL 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (141GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
H200 NVL
+402%
60.32 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Nov 2024
Quadro Ada
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
132
2816
Shading Units
16896
88
TMUs
528
48
ROPs
24
88
Tensor Cores
528
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.84 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
942.5 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
241.3 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
60.32 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.16 TFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
600W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GH100
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
80 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
9.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
