NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 TiM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2130MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Lower TDP (70W vs 220W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3070 TiM
+38%
16.6 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Nov 2022
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
46
2816
Shading Units
5888
88
TMUs
184
48
ROPs
96
88
Tensor Cores
184
22
RT Cores
46
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
135.4 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
259.4 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
16.60 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.60 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
259.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
220W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
