Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (2130MHz vs 1470MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 168.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +77%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
6.774 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Feb 2024
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
1042 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
18
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
2304
88
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
72
22
RT Cores
18
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.04 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.8 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.774 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.774 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GA107
-
GPU Variant
GA107-325-K2-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy