NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
2576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1594%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
30
2816
Shading Units
240
88
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
204W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
