Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 740 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +1452%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 740 OEM
0.773 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2015
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
384
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.048 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.19 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
772.6 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.19 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy