NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 740 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 's Advantages
Lower TDP (64W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1472%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 740
0.763 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1478%
8147
GeForce GT 740
516
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1878%
3601
GeForce GT 740
182
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
May 2014
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
384
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.944 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.78 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
762.6 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.78 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
64W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-425-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
