NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
2720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+4569%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1826%
8147
GeForce GT 240
423
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Nov 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
12
2816
Shading Units
96
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
