NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro S9050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+271%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro S9050
3.226 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
1792
88
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
