ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 134W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 31.36GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Mar 2013
Radeon R400 AGP
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
490 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
31.36GB/s
Bandwidth
144.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
12
TMUs
64
12
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.51 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.05 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.585 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
66.05 GFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
134W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x Molex
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
R420
GPU Name
GK106
R420 GTO
GPU Variant
GK106-240-A1
R400
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.16 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
281 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
-
Shader Model
5.1
