Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 31.36GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon R400 AGP
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
490 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
31.36GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
-
Shading Units
240
12
TMUs
80
12
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

49W
TDP
204W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x Molex
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R420
GPU Name
GT200B
R420 GTO
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
R400
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.16 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
281 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
-
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net