ATI Radeon X1650 AGP vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Feb 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
80
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
17W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV530
GPU Name
Cedar
RV530 X1650
(215CCCBKB12FG)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0
