ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 AGP and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon X1050 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 150W)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R300
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1300 MHz
-
-
-
203 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
24W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV360
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
-
-
-
Rage 9
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.06 billion
Transistors
Unknown
76 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0 (9_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.5
