Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega Nano +28033%
12.66 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2009
Vega
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1247 MHz
Base Clock
-
1546 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

98.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
395.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
12.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
791.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GT218
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy