AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 56 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 's Advantages
Boost Clock1471MHz
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 409.6GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 210W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega 56
10.54 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+1%
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Vega
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1156 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
1471 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
56
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
4096
224
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
94.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
329.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
21.09 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
10.54 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
659.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
210W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vega 10
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Vega 10 XL
(215-0894216)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
495 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
