AMD Radeon RX 9070 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 9070 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX 9070 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (644.6GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 220W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 9070
+239%
36.13 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2025
Release Date
Unknown
Navi IV
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1330 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2518 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
644.6GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
56
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
4096
224
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
256
112
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
322.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
564.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
72.25 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
36.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
1129 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
220W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 48
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Navi 48 XT
(215-176600331)
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 4.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
12 nm
53.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
357 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
