AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs ATI FireGL V8650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6950 XT
+5275%
23.65 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2022
Release Date
Aug 2007
Navi II
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1860 MHz
Base Clock
-
2310 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
80
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
320
320
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
295.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
739.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
47.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
1478 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
335W
TDP
Unknown
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 21
GPU Name
R600
Navi 21 KXTX
(215-121000289)
GPU Variant
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
