Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 6750 XT and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
Navi II
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

2150 MHz
Base Clock
-
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
40
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
-
160
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

166.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
416.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
26.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
832.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 22
GPU Name
RV380
Navi 22 KXT (215-127000144)
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
130 nm
17.2 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
335 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy