AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650 XT and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2635MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.3GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (176W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6650 XT
+1913%
10.79 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2022
Release Date
Sep 2008
Navi II
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2055 MHz
Base Clock
-
2635 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2190 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
280.3GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
2048
Shading Units
216
128
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
168.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
337.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
21.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
674.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
176W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 23
GPU Name
GT200
Navi 23 KXT
(215-130000136)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
