Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650 XT and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2635MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (176W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 280.3GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6650 XT +35%
10.79 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2022
Release Date
Mar 2016
Navi II
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2055 MHz
Base Clock
-
2635 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2190 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
280.3GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
64
2048
Shading Units
4096
128
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

168.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
337.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
21.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
674.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Navi 23 KXT (215-130000136)
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

176W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy