Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs ATI FireMV 2250

AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2321MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 53W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2007
Navi II
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1923 MHz
Base Clock
-
2321 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.27 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
7.130 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.565 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
222.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
RV516
Navi 24 XL (215-135000046)
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

53W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy