Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs AMD FirePro W4000

AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 GME and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 590 GME 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1420MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 590 GME +416%
6.543 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2020
Release Date
Aug 2012
Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1257 MHz
Base Clock
-
1420 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
12
2304
Shading Units
768
144
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

45.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
204.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
6.543 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.543 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
409.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Polaris 20
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Polaris 20 XTR (215-0910066)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy