AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs AMD FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Radeon RX 5600 XT and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5600 XT
+835%
7.188 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
Navi
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1130 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
512
144
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
99.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
224.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
14.38 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.188 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 10
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Navi 10 XLE
(215-0917338)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
