Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 480 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD Radeon RX 480 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 480 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 480 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2016
Release Date
Jan 2008
Arctic Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
-
144
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
RV380
Polaris 10 XT (215-0876184)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Rage 9
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
130 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy