AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

VS

AMD Radeon R9 Nano AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 6750 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)

1536 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 7 months late

Boost Clock2600MHz

More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 Nano

8.192 TFLOPS

Radeon RX 6750 XT +62%

13.31 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 Nano

4607

Radeon RX 6750 XT +192%

13491

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 Nano

28

Radeon RX 6750 XT +92%

54

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 Nano

60

Radeon RX 6750 XT +73%

104

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 Nano

75

Radeon RX 6750 XT +105%

154

Radeon R9 Nano

VS

Radeon RX 6750 XT

Graphics Card

Aug 2015

Release Date

Mar 2022

Pirate Islands

Generation

Navi II

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

2150 MHz

-

Boost Clock

2600 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

2250 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

12GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6

4096bit

Memory Bus

192bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

432.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

64

Compute Units

40

4096

Shading Units

2560

256

TMUs

160

64

ROPs

64

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

40

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

2 MB

L2 Cache

3 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

166.4 GPixel/s

256.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

416.0 GTexel/s

8.192 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

26.62 TFLOPS

8.192 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

13.31 TFLOPS

512.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

832.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

Navi 22

Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)

GPU Variant

Navi 22 KXT (215-127000144)

GCN 3.0

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

7 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

17.2 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

335 mm²

Board Design

175W

TDP

250W

450 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

2.1

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

-

6.3

Shader Model

6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

2

AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

3

NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

4

NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

5

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

7

AMD Radeon RX 5500 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

8

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro W8100

9

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FirePro 2270 PCIe x1

10

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp