Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA P106 100

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA P106 100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 6GB VRAM P106 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.2GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA P106 100 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1709MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (120W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +87%
8.192 TFLOPS
P106 100
4.375 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R9 Nano +13%
4607
P106 100
4063
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2017
Pirate Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1709 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
10
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
1280
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
82.03 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
136.7 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
68.36 GFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.375 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GP106
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
GP106-100-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
120W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy