AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
3.723 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q
+65%
6.18 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
Crystal System
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
682 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
2048
Shading Units
2560
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
GA107
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.3
Shader Model
6.8
